Difference between revisions of "Talk:TwoCC"

From MultimediaWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Questions)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
It includes a large number of ones that may have been registered, but never actually used- see Intel's registering of H.260-269. [[User:Dashcloud|Dashcloud]] 12:35, 10 January 2009 (EST)
 
It includes a large number of ones that may have been registered, but never actually used- see Intel's registering of H.260-269. [[User:Dashcloud|Dashcloud]] 12:35, 10 January 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
Is it worth turning all the twocc's into wiki links? If so, I'll do it, and migrate any info from my user page on those to the appropriate page.
 +
In addition, if the above is considered a good idea, should the link be the hex value, or the name of the codec?
 +
Mostly unrelated, but should audio twocc go on the navigation bar like video fourcc?  [[User:Dashcloud|Dashcloud]] 00:37, 28 January 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 21:37, 27 January 2009

merge this list

  (list removed)
Dashcloud merged the list, thanks! --Compn 16:45, 1 October 2007 (EDT)

This page should be hooked up to one of the other audio pages- otherwise, the only way to get to it is from the terminology page or searching for it. I'm not sure which category it should be under though. Thoughts? Dashcloud 12:07, 31 December 2008 (EST)

probably to Microsoft Audio/Video Interleaved --Compn 14:44, 31 December 2008 (EST)

Official MS one is here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms867195.aspx

It includes a large number of ones that may have been registered, but never actually used- see Intel's registering of H.260-269. Dashcloud 12:35, 10 January 2009 (EST)

Is it worth turning all the twocc's into wiki links? If so, I'll do it, and migrate any info from my user page on those to the appropriate page. In addition, if the above is considered a good idea, should the link be the hex value, or the name of the codec? Mostly unrelated, but should audio twocc go on the navigation bar like video fourcc? Dashcloud 00:37, 28 January 2009 (EST)