Talk:Microsoft MPEG-4: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
erm, isnt some advanced profile wmv3 still not fully supported? -- | erm, isnt some advanced profile wmv3 still not fully supported? --~ | ||
: We don't qualify WMV3/VC-1 as being in the family of MS MPEG-4 codecs. The line ended with WMV2. --[[User:Multimedia Mike|Multimedia Mike]] 23:23, 11 November 2007 (EST) | : We don't qualify WMV3/VC-1 as being in the family of MS MPEG-4 codecs. The line ended with WMV2. --[[User:Multimedia Mike|Multimedia Mike]] 23:23, 11 November 2007 (EST) | ||
:: WMV3 != VC-1, WMV3 has own set of features, some of them unsupported (YUV411 interlacing, old P-frame coding scheme) and VC-1 has other things (slices, another form of interlacing). And WMV3 is definitely close to MSMPEG-4 than to anything else. --[[User:Kostya|Kostya]] 00:03, 12 November 2007 (EST) | :: WMV3 != VC-1, WMV3 has own set of features, some of them unsupported (YUV411 interlacing, old P-frame coding scheme) and VC-1 has other things (slices, another form of interlacing). And WMV3 is definitely close to MSMPEG-4 than to anything else. --[[User:Kostya|Kostya]] 00:03, 12 November 2007 (EST) | ||
::: wmv3 is mpeg4, no? and its microsoft, so i thought microsoftmpeg4 was a good description. but ok.... --[[User:Compn|Compn]] 20:45, 12 November 2007 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 18:45, 12 November 2007
erm, isnt some advanced profile wmv3 still not fully supported? --~
- We don't qualify WMV3/VC-1 as being in the family of MS MPEG-4 codecs. The line ended with WMV2. --Multimedia Mike 23:23, 11 November 2007 (EST)
- WMV3 != VC-1, WMV3 has own set of features, some of them unsupported (YUV411 interlacing, old P-frame coding scheme) and VC-1 has other things (slices, another form of interlacing). And WMV3 is definitely close to MSMPEG-4 than to anything else. --Kostya 00:03, 12 November 2007 (EST)
- wmv3 is mpeg4, no? and its microsoft, so i thought microsoftmpeg4 was a good description. but ok.... --Compn 20:45, 12 November 2007 (EST)