Difference between revisions of "Talk:MPEG-2 Transport Stream"

From MultimediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (signature)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
I don't expect this to cause much duplication of effort, because while a highly-detailed overview of the entire spec would be a GOOD thing on this site, it's not really what wikipedia's for.[[User:Snacky|Snacky]] 15:32, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
 
I don't expect this to cause much duplication of effort, because while a highly-detailed overview of the entire spec would be a GOOD thing on this site, it's not really what wikipedia's for.[[User:Snacky|Snacky]] 15:32, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
:I like your work so far. There's a lot of stuff here I didn't know because I'm no expert on MPEG, yet. You're right that this is a better place for this hardcore data than Wikipedia is. --[[User:Multimedia Mike|Multimedia Mike]] 17:03, 18 June 2006 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 14:03, 18 June 2006

I copy-pasted this from my own contribution to Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_stream - taking out parts I don't consider to be important :-)

Feel free to hit me over the head if this is a dumb idea. More importantly, feel free to improve the article so it doesn't suck so much.

I don't expect this to cause much duplication of effort, because while a highly-detailed overview of the entire spec would be a GOOD thing on this site, it's not really what wikipedia's for.Snacky 15:32, 18 June 2006 (EDT)

I like your work so far. There's a lot of stuff here I didn't know because I'm no expert on MPEG, yet. You're right that this is a better place for this hardcore data than Wikipedia is. --Multimedia Mike 17:03, 18 June 2006 (EDT)