Talk:Interesting Patches: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Answer a question) |
Suxen drol (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
From what I can tell by looking at the output of ffmpeg -formats, everything mentioned in the first post about the patch is in: | From what I can tell by looking at the output of ffmpeg -formats, everything mentioned in the first post about the patch is in: | ||
TQI and EAMAD aren't listed, but the samples play fine (except for 2)- they show up as mdec. [[User:Dashcloud|Dashcloud]] 22:23, 18 January 2009 (EST) | TQI and EAMAD aren't listed, but the samples play fine (except for 2)- they show up as mdec. [[User:Dashcloud|Dashcloud]] 22:23, 18 January 2009 (EST) | ||
Individual patches for TQI and MAD are outstanding. These will make it to ffmpeg-devel real soon now. --[[User:Suxen drol|Suxen drol]] 06:35, 22 January 2009 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:35, 22 January 2009
I would like to upload the H.263 patch to the wiki, but it seems it is not accepted. It looks like a wiki configuration problem... Vitor
Electronic Arts Formats demuxer/decoder by Peter Ross
Which parts of this patch didn't reach svn? - Vitor 05:16, 16 March 2008 (EDT)
From what I can tell by looking at the output of ffmpeg -formats, everything mentioned in the first post about the patch is in: TQI and EAMAD aren't listed, but the samples play fine (except for 2)- they show up as mdec. Dashcloud 22:23, 18 January 2009 (EST)
Individual patches for TQI and MAD are outstanding. These will make it to ffmpeg-devel real soon now. --Suxen drol 06:35, 22 January 2009 (EST)