Talk:FFmpeg Summer Of Code 2007: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(ATRAC3 ?) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== DPX Encoder/Decoder == | == DPX Encoder/Decoder == | ||
From what I understand this is the output of most film scanners. Having not used one I'm not 100% sure of this, and maybe someone could clarify, but my understanding is that film scanners output a collection of these files (I'm unsure if they're put in a container or not). There are already open source implementations in imagemagick and graphics magick. | From what I understand this is the output of most film scanners. Having not used one I'm not 100% sure of this, and maybe someone could clarify, but my understanding is that film scanners output a collection of these files (I'm unsure if they're put in a container or not). There are already open source implementations in imagemagick and graphics magick. | ||
== ATRAC3 == | |||
Should http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/44526 be added to small tasks? | |||
[[User:Ce|Ce]] 04:41, 8 March 2007 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 02:41, 8 March 2007
TIFF/TGA encoder?
Why? It seems too small a task to be done in the course of SoC. --Kostya 09:20, 7 March 2007 (EST)
- True, I'll rework it. --Merbanan 11:44, 7 March 2007 (EST)
DPX Encoder/Decoder
From what I understand this is the output of most film scanners. Having not used one I'm not 100% sure of this, and maybe someone could clarify, but my understanding is that film scanners output a collection of these files (I'm unsure if they're put in a container or not). There are already open source implementations in imagemagick and graphics magick.
ATRAC3
Should http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/44526 be added to small tasks? Ce 04:41, 8 March 2007 (EST)