FFmpeg Release Plan: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Suxen drol (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Suxen drol (talk | contribs) (+Rationale for) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* No half-implemented functionality that may break existing user apps. | * No half-implemented functionality that may break existing user apps. | ||
* Endurance/memleak testing on film-length files. | * Endurance/memleak testing on film-length files. | ||
==Rationale for releases== | |||
* Provide endorsed snapshots for external software developers to develop against | |||
* Avoid sitation where external software developers using SVN head when head has transient limitations. | |||
* Discourage external software developers using ancient snapshots that we no don't support. | |||
[[Category:FFmpeg]] | [[Category:FFmpeg]] |
Revision as of 04:15, 27 January 2009
Ideas and suggestions concerning FFmpeg software releases.
Things that need doing
- Fix DV regression tests on PPC
- Approximately 95% test coverage in FATE.
Release Criteria
- make test passes.
- FATE test converage passes for all platforms of interest.
- All 'important' bugs reported in roundup fixed/closed.
- No half-implemented functionality that may break existing user apps.
- Endurance/memleak testing on film-length files.
Rationale for releases
- Provide endorsed snapshots for external software developers to develop against
- Avoid sitation where external software developers using SVN head when head has transient limitations.
- Discourage external software developers using ancient snapshots that we no don't support.