FFmpeg Release Plan: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Suxen drol (talk | contribs) (+Rationale for) |
m (→Rationale for releases: drop extraneous "no") |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* Provide endorsed snapshots for external software developers to develop against | * Provide endorsed snapshots for external software developers to develop against | ||
* Avoid sitation where external software developers using SVN head when head has transient limitations. | * Avoid sitation where external software developers using SVN head when head has transient limitations. | ||
* Discourage external software developers using ancient snapshots that we | * Discourage external software developers using ancient snapshots that we don't support. | ||
[[Category:FFmpeg]] | [[Category:FFmpeg]] |
Revision as of 05:14, 27 January 2009
Ideas and suggestions concerning FFmpeg software releases.
Things that need doing
- Fix DV regression tests on PPC
- Approximately 95% test coverage in FATE.
Release Criteria
- make test passes.
- FATE test converage passes for all platforms of interest.
- All 'important' bugs reported in roundup fixed/closed.
- No half-implemented functionality that may break existing user apps.
- Endurance/memleak testing on film-length files.
Rationale for releases
- Provide endorsed snapshots for external software developers to develop against
- Avoid sitation where external software developers using SVN head when head has transient limitations.
- Discourage external software developers using ancient snapshots that we don't support.