Talk:ISO MPEG-4 - Revision history

Multimedia Mike at 17:45, 14 December 2008

2008-12-14T17:45:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:45, 14 December 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: I just thought it's nice to be able to prove the existence of the FourCC in the wild. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 03:00, 14 December 2008 (EST)		: I just thought it's nice to be able to prove the existence of the FourCC in the wild. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 03:00, 14 December 2008 (EST)
	:: hmm, i'm still not convinced. how about putting them into a subdir, like V-codecs/MPEG4/DCOD etc? dont want to pollute v-codecs with these... --[[User:Compn\|Compn]] 08:40, 14 December 2008 (EST)		:: hmm, i'm still not convinced. how about putting them into a subdir, like V-codecs/MPEG4/DCOD etc? dont want to pollute v-codecs with these... --[[User:Compn\|Compn]] 08:40, 14 December 2008 (EST)
			::: That might work, though I would like to get some more input from other interested parties before we do this. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 12:45, 14 December 2008 (EST)

	==old==		==old==

Compn at 13:40, 14 December 2008

2008-12-14T13:40:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 14 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	i dont see the point in keeping around mpeg4 asp samples with different fourcc's. are they special in any way aside from the fourcc change? --[[User:Compn\|Compn]] 00:58, 14 December 2008 (EST)		i dont see the point in keeping around mpeg4 asp samples with different fourcc's. are they special in any way aside from the fourcc change? --[[User:Compn\|Compn]] 00:58, 14 December 2008 (EST)
	: I just thought it's nice to be able to prove the existence of the FourCC in the wild. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 03:00, 14 December 2008 (EST)		: I just thought it's nice to be able to prove the existence of the FourCC in the wild. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 03:00, 14 December 2008 (EST)
			:: hmm, i'm still not convinced. how about putting them into a subdir, like V-codecs/MPEG4/DCOD etc? dont want to pollute v-codecs with these... --[[User:Compn\|Compn]] 08:40, 14 December 2008 (EST)

	==old==		==old==

Multimedia Mike at 08:00, 14 December 2008

2008-12-14T08:00:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:00, 14 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	i dont see the point in keeping around mpeg4 asp samples with different fourcc's. are they special in any way aside from the fourcc change? --[[User:Compn\|Compn]] 00:58, 14 December 2008 (EST)		i dont see the point in keeping around mpeg4 asp samples with different fourcc's. are they special in any way aside from the fourcc change? --[[User:Compn\|Compn]] 00:58, 14 December 2008 (EST)
			: I just thought it's nice to be able to prove the existence of the FourCC in the wild. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 03:00, 14 December 2008 (EST)

Compn at 05:58, 14 December 2008

2008-12-14T05:58:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:58, 13 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			i dont see the point in keeping around mpeg4 asp samples with different fourcc's. are they special in any way aside from the fourcc change? --[[User:Compn\|Compn]] 00:58, 14 December 2008 (EST)


			==old==
	I think the entire conception of this page is confused.		I think the entire conception of this page is confused.

Multimedia Mike at 22:38, 8 May 2006

2006-05-08T22:38:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 8 May 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:OK, will do, probably before 1 week passes. I thought I should give warning first. Note that my re-organization of the topics will essentially end up looking like Wikipedia's, which I consider to be more correct. [[User:Snacky\|Snacky]] 16:36, 8 May 2006 (EDT)		:OK, will do, probably before 1 week passes. I thought I should give warning first. Note that my re-organization of the topics will essentially end up looking like Wikipedia's, which I consider to be more correct. [[User:Snacky\|Snacky]] 16:36, 8 May 2006 (EDT)

			::I haven't looked at Wikipedia's treatment of the subject but I'm trusting you on this. Ideally, the re-org should provide a roadmap for us to fill in the highly technical details (bitstream syntax, reconstruction process). --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 18:38, 8 May 2006 (EDT)

Snacky at 20:36, 8 May 2006

2006-05-08T20:36:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:36, 8 May 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Snacky-- please, by all means, I invite you to edit this page up one side and down the other. That's what the Wiki concept is for. Split it out into other pages and reorganize as you see fit. We need people who take initiative. I eventually want to cover all of this stuff in the Wiki (everything multimedia, after all). --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 16:20, 8 May 2006 (EDT)		Snacky-- please, by all means, I invite you to edit this page up one side and down the other. That's what the Wiki concept is for. Split it out into other pages and reorganize as you see fit. We need people who take initiative. I eventually want to cover all of this stuff in the Wiki (everything multimedia, after all). --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 16:20, 8 May 2006 (EDT)

	:OK, will do, probably before 1 week passes. I thought I should give warning first. Note that my re-organization of the topics will essentially end up looking like Wikipedia's, which I consider to be more correct.		:OK, will do, probably before 1 week passes. I thought I should give warning first. Note that my re-organization of the topics will essentially end up looking like Wikipedia's, which I consider to be more correct. [[User:Snacky\|Snacky]] 16:36, 8 May 2006 (EDT)

Snacky at 20:30, 8 May 2006

2006-05-08T20:30:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 8 May 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Snacky-- please, by all means, I invite you to edit this page up one side and down the other. That's what the Wiki concept is for. Split it out into other pages and reorganize as you see fit. We need people who take initiative. I eventually want to cover all of this stuff in the Wiki (everything multimedia, after all). --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 16:20, 8 May 2006 (EDT)		Snacky-- please, by all means, I invite you to edit this page up one side and down the other. That's what the Wiki concept is for. Split it out into other pages and reorganize as you see fit. We need people who take initiative. I eventually want to cover all of this stuff in the Wiki (everything multimedia, after all). --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 16:20, 8 May 2006 (EDT)

			:OK, will do, probably before 1 week passes. I thought I should give warning first. Note that my re-organization of the topics will essentially end up looking like Wikipedia's, which I consider to be more correct.

Multimedia Mike at 20:20, 8 May 2006

2006-05-08T20:20:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:20, 8 May 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:Replying to myself here. How about renaming this article to "MPEG-4 ASP" (lame, annoying name IMO but it also happens to be more correct)? Then you could have an "MPEG-4" page that breaks down the standards suite into its components (parts). One component will be "MPEG-4 Part 2", which in turn breaks down into a bunch of profiles, of which only "Simple Profile" and "Advanced Simple Profile" are really of any interest.		:Replying to myself here. How about renaming this article to "MPEG-4 ASP" (lame, annoying name IMO but it also happens to be more correct)? Then you could have an "MPEG-4" page that breaks down the standards suite into its components (parts). One component will be "MPEG-4 Part 2", which in turn breaks down into a bunch of profiles, of which only "Simple Profile" and "Advanced Simple Profile" are really of any interest.
	[[User:Snacky\|Snacky]] 15:38, 8 May 2006 (EDT)		[[User:Snacky\|Snacky]] 15:38, 8 May 2006 (EDT)

			Snacky-- please, by all means, I invite you to edit this page up one side and down the other. That's what the Wiki concept is for. Split it out into other pages and reorganize as you see fit. We need people who take initiative. I eventually want to cover all of this stuff in the Wiki (everything multimedia, after all). --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 16:20, 8 May 2006 (EDT)

Snacky: I always forget to sign

2006-05-08T19:38:12Z

I always forget to sign

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:38, 8 May 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:Replying to myself here. How about renaming this article to "MPEG-4 ASP" (lame, annoying name IMO but it also happens to be more correct)? Then you could have an "MPEG-4" page that breaks down the standards suite into its components (parts). One component will be "MPEG-4 Part 2", which in turn breaks down into a bunch of profiles, of which only "Simple Profile" and "Advanced Simple Profile" are really of any interest.		:Replying to myself here. How about renaming this article to "MPEG-4 ASP" (lame, annoying name IMO but it also happens to be more correct)? Then you could have an "MPEG-4" page that breaks down the standards suite into its components (parts). One component will be "MPEG-4 Part 2", which in turn breaks down into a bunch of profiles, of which only "Simple Profile" and "Advanced Simple Profile" are really of any interest.
			[[User:Snacky\|Snacky]] 15:38, 8 May 2006 (EDT)

Snacky: more whining about terminology

2006-05-08T19:37:35Z

more whining about terminology

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:37, 8 May 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:
	--[[User:Snacky\|Snacky]] 19:28, 26 January 2006 (EST)		--[[User:Snacky\|Snacky]] 19:28, 26 January 2006 (EST)

	~~== ISO~~ MPEG-4 ~~Video ==~~		:Replying to myself here. How about renaming this article to "MPEG-4 ASP" (lame, annoying name IMO but it also happens to be more correct)? Then you could have an "MPEG-4" page that breaks down the standards suite into its components (parts). One component will be "MPEG-4 Part 2", which in turn breaks down into a bunch of profiles, of which only "Simple Profile" and "Advanced Simple Profile" are really of any interest.

	~~When I wrote this page I had ISO~~ MPEG-4 ~~video in mind specifically. I should probably move the page. I was just getting the Wiki off the ground when the original~~ page ~~was created. Over time, the true structure of~~ the ~~information should reveal itself via the Wiki. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 13:39, 30 January 2006~~ (~~EST~~)

	~~== FourCC discussion ==~~

	~~I think this Wiki is not the place to give encoding/compatibility hints~~. ~~Or at least not this page~~, ~~it would belong~~ in ~~another article. So I'd like to remove this section again~~. ~~--[[User:DonDiego\|DonDiego]] 01:57, 25 February 2006 (EST)~~