Talk:IBM PhotoMotion - Revision history

Kostya: Kostya moved page Talk:American Laser Games MM to Talk:IBM PhotoMotion: the format turned out to be from IBM after all

2024-06-06T16:10:05Z

Kostya moved page Talk:American Laser Games MM to Talk:IBM PhotoMotion: the format turned out to be from IBM after all

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:10, 6 June 2024
(No difference)

VAG: who knows?

2007-03-14T20:46:55Z

who knows?

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 14 March 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:

	: Your guess is as good as mine! :-) I have been trying to figure this out ever since this article rocketed to the top of the charts. According to the log files, there's no major linking effort for this particular article. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 13:06, 14 March 2007 (EDT)		: Your guess is as good as mine! :-) I have been trying to figure this out ever since this article rocketed to the top of the charts. According to the log files, there's no major linking effort for this particular article. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 13:06, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

			:: I guess google just love "american" "games"... --[[User:VAG\|VAG]] 16:46, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Multimedia Mike at 17:07, 14 March 2007

2007-03-14T17:07:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:07, 14 March 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Why does this article have over 80,000 views? [[Special:Popularpages]] --[[User:Compn\|Compn]] 11:14, 14 March 2007 (EDT)		Why does this article have over 80,000 views? [[Special:Popularpages]] --[[User:Compn\|Compn]] 11:14, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

	~~== I can't account for its popularity ==~~

	: Your guess is as good as mine! :-) I have been trying to figure this out ever since this article rocketed to the top of the charts. According to the log files, there's no major linking effort for this particular article. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 13:06, 14 March 2007 (EDT)		: Your guess is as good as mine! :-) I have been trying to figure this out ever since this article rocketed to the top of the charts. According to the log files, there's no major linking effort for this particular article. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 13:06, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Multimedia Mike: I can't account for its popularity

2007-03-14T17:06:50Z

I can't account for its popularity

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:06, 14 March 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Why does this article have over 80,000 views? [[Special:Popularpages]] --[[User:Compn\|Compn]] 11:14, 14 March 2007 (EDT)		Why does this article have over 80,000 views? [[Special:Popularpages]] --[[User:Compn\|Compn]] 11:14, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

			== I can't account for its popularity ==

			: Your guess is as good as mine! :-) I have been trying to figure this out ever since this article rocketed to the top of the charts. According to the log files, there's no major linking effort for this particular article. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 13:06, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Compn: why is this article so popular?

2007-03-14T15:14:48Z

why is this article so popular?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:14, 14 March 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	The description of the LIB file header as a "special" chunk-type was misleading. Ideally the LIB file format should be described on another wiki page, or on a site dedicated to archive file formats (hence the GRAF link). --[[User:Suxen_drol\|pete]]		The description of the LIB file header as a "special" chunk-type was misleading. Ideally the LIB file format should be described on another wiki page, or on a site dedicated to archive file formats (hence the GRAF link). --[[User:Suxen_drol\|pete]]

			Why does this article have over 80,000 views? [[Special:Popularpages]] --[[User:Compn\|Compn]] 11:14, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Suxen drol at 12:15, 14 February 2006

2006-02-14T12:15:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 14 February 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Because this Wiki specializes in multimedia tech. That other Wiki (Xentax) specializes in GRAFs. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 19:09, 13 February 2006 (EST)		Because this Wiki specializes in multimedia tech. That other Wiki (Xentax) specializes in GRAFs. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 19:09, 13 February 2006 (EST)

			The description of the LIB file header as a "special" chunk-type was misleading. Ideally the LIB file format should be described on another wiki page, or on a site dedicated to archive file formats (hence the GRAF link). --[[User:Suxen_drol\|pete]]

Multimedia Mike at 00:09, 14 February 2006

2006-02-14T00:09:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:09, 13 February 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Allright, but I still don't get it. Why to remove our own already existing description?		Allright, but I still don't get it. Why to remove our own already existing description?

			Because this Wiki specializes in multimedia tech. That other Wiki (Xentax) specializes in GRAFs. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 19:09, 13 February 2006 (EST)

VAG at 20:02, 13 February 2006

2006-02-13T20:02:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:02, 13 February 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	...because that other Wiki specializes in GRAFs (game resource archive formats). I am the one who put the ALG-LIB description in that Wiki. But their Wiki also contains some bits of multimedia-specific information (like the 7th Guest VDX format). Maybe we will be able to negotiate and bring that data over to this Wiki for maintenance. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 20:08, 12 February 2006 (EST)		...because that other Wiki specializes in GRAFs (game resource archive formats). I am the one who put the ALG-LIB description in that Wiki. But their Wiki also contains some bits of multimedia-specific information (like the 7th Guest VDX format). Maybe we will be able to negotiate and bring that data over to this Wiki for maintenance. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 20:08, 12 February 2006 (EST)

			Allright, but I still don't get it. Why to remove our own already existing description?

Multimedia Mike at 01:08, 13 February 2006

2006-02-13T01:08:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 12 February 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What's the point to throw away mm lib package description from it's main specification to another wiki site? I think keeping all format-related stuff in one place is far more handy?		What's the point to throw away mm lib package description from it's main specification to another wiki site? I think keeping all format-related stuff in one place is far more handy?

			...because that other Wiki specializes in GRAFs (game resource archive formats). I am the one who put the ALG-LIB description in that Wiki. But their Wiki also contains some bits of multimedia-specific information (like the 7th Guest VDX format). Maybe we will be able to negotiate and bring that data over to this Wiki for maintenance. --[[User:Multimedia Mike\|Multimedia Mike]] 20:08, 12 February 2006 (EST)

VAG at 23:40, 12 February 2006

2006-02-12T23:40:53Z

New page

What's the point to throw away mm lib package description from it's main specification to another wiki site? I think keeping all format-related stuff in one place is far more handy?