<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AEuclid_Video</id>
	<title>Talk:Euclid Video - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AEuclid_Video"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?title=Talk:Euclid_Video&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-08-02T03:19:51Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.5</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?title=Talk:Euclid_Video&amp;diff=3938&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Snacky at 14:30, 14 April 2006</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?title=Talk:Euclid_Video&amp;diff=3938&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2006-04-14T14:30:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;AFAICT, these guys are scammers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they have is an H.264 encoder that seems to be very heavily based on JM. Actually I suspect the encoder component is just JM with mostly minor changes. And they've bolted on to it some video preprocesser that crops, scales, and decimates. Anecdotally, x264 can beat Euclid's output quality when given comparable input. [[User:Snacky|Snacky]] 10:30, 14 April 2006 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Snacky</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>