User talk:Multimedia Mike: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(wishlist page question) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I wonder if you could email these guys and ask about the deinterlacing filter technology, maybe it can help ffmpeg/mplayer filters? http://www.compression.ru/video/deinterlacing/index_en.html --[[User:Compn|Compn]] 11:29, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | I wonder if you could email these guys and ask about the deinterlacing filter technology, maybe it can help ffmpeg/mplayer filters? http://www.compression.ru/video/deinterlacing/index_en.html --[[User:Compn|Compn]] 11:29, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
: I really doubt it. Most of their developments are sold to another companies. For now their contribution to opensource is one quite trivial patch to x264 and some video quality measuring software. --[[User:Kostya|Kostya]] 12:37, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | : I really doubt it. Most of their developments are sold to another companies. For now their contribution to opensource is one quite trivial patch to x264 and some video quality measuring software. --[[User:Kostya|Kostya]] 12:37, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
mike, I didn't quite get the changes you made in the [[FFmpeg Wishlist|wishlist]] page. I wanted to link to mainly the SoC tasks that weren't taken by any student, but the page your created have only those taken. Also, I tried to make a distinction between reviewed feature request (ok'ed by Michael explicitly or implicitly) and the other ones... --[[User:Vitor|Vitor]] 07:36, 21 October 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 04:36, 21 October 2007
mike, did you get my email about the old-incoming review i did? http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-advusers/2007-January/001597.html
there were some samples you might want to look at before they are deleted. Compn 22:40, 31 January 2007 (EST)
I wonder if you could email these guys and ask about the deinterlacing filter technology, maybe it can help ffmpeg/mplayer filters? http://www.compression.ru/video/deinterlacing/index_en.html --Compn 11:29, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
- I really doubt it. Most of their developments are sold to another companies. For now their contribution to opensource is one quite trivial patch to x264 and some video quality measuring software. --Kostya 12:37, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
mike, I didn't quite get the changes you made in the wishlist page. I wanted to link to mainly the SoC tasks that weren't taken by any student, but the page your created have only those taken. Also, I tried to make a distinction between reviewed feature request (ok'ed by Michael explicitly or implicitly) and the other ones... --Vitor 07:36, 21 October 2007 (EDT)